Instructional & Informational Memorandum
IIM-TMPD-2.0
Sheet 6 of 13
VTrans and the Surface Transportation Planning process, that should be presented
through informative visual displays; (c) focusing specific analysis at the broad corridor
level and at some key geographic areas within corridor; and (d) establishing the
groundwork for participation in the study, including local and stakeholder participation.
STEP 2: Corridor Vision and Planning Framework
The Corridor visioning involves the collaborative efforts of VDOT, the Locality, DRPT,
and other stakeholders to apply the statewide goals of VTrans to the specific corridor,
and developing potential strategies that respect the Locality and stakeholder
objectives. Additional input will be sought through meetings with individual or groups
of stakeholders and through public meetings in accordance with the Public
Participation in Virginia’s Transportation Planning and Programming Process
guidebook.
STEP 3: Technical Analysis
The technical analysis must ensure that an appropriate evaluation of the traffic
demand and operations is made for a particular location or area. The level of the
analysis will be based on the intensity of current and future traffic demands. Technical
analyses will include the collection of traffic data in accordance with the Traffic
Operations and Safety Analysis Manual (TOSAM), conducting field reviews and
stakeholder interviews, analysis of existing conditions (e.g. land use, crash analysis,
access conformance as per VDOT’s Access Management Regulations, traffic
operations), and development of traffic volume forecasts consistent with regional or
statewide forecasting procedures. Regardless of the methodology used, all traffic
forecasts developed for the corridor study must be recorded in the Statewide Planning
System by contacting VDOT Transportation and Mobility Planning Division. The
analysis will identify all issues that need to be addressed and resolved. Alternatives
will be developed, analyzed and evaluated in accordance with TOSAM, with emphasis
on creative, cost effective and context sensitive design solutions.
Common Sense Engineering and Context Sensitive Designs will be employed in the
consideration/evaluation of alternatives. Alternatives should optimize the existing
roadway capacity through methods such as operational improvements, access
management, Alternative Intersection/Interchange (AI/I) designs, turn lanes, and
technology/signal operation improvements to facilitate mobility at existing signals as
well as Transportation Demand Management (TDM) before recommending additional
capacity through roadway widening. TDM strategies include but are not limited to
Park & Ride Lots, transit, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, and employer outreach for
flexible work schedules and telework opportunities. New signals at currently non-
signalized intersections shall be evaluated in accordance with IIM TE-387 and the
Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD. Results of these evaluations will be shared with
stakeholders at public meetings.